ArticlePloS one2025
IconicITA: Iconicity ratings of the Italian affective lexicon.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incipient Constituents: Phonesthemes Facilitate Word Processing in English.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iconicity, defined as the potential of linguistic signs to resemble properties or features of their referents, is increasingly recognized as a general property of language. One common approach for quantifying iconicity is to collect iconicity ratings. Although iconicity datasets have been developed for several languages, no comprehensive dataset of iconicity ratings is currently available for Italian. The current study presents IconicITA, the first dataset of Italian iconicity ratings for the 1,121 words of the Italian adaptation of Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW). Ratings were collected from both Italian native speakers (L1) and English native speakers with Italian as a second language (L2). Including L2 participants allowed us to contribute to the debate on whether iconicity ratings genuinely measure form-meaning resemblance, rather than exclusively reflecting semantic properties. We showed that L1 Italian iconicity ratings are positively associated with perceptual strength in the auditory and haptic modalities, and with specificity ratings. Conversely, we found a negative correlation between iconicity and concreteness, age of acquisition, word frequency, and letter frequency. In general, the relationship between Italian iconicity norms and various psycholinguistic variables largely replicated previous findings in the literature on iconicity. Considering L2 data, the ratings provided by L2 speakers correlated more strongly with the Italian L1 data compared to the translation-equivalent English L1 data. This finding suggests that participants' judgments were influenced not only by the semantic information of the words but also by language-specific form-level properties. We take this result as evidence of the validity of iconicity ratings to operationalize the degree of resemblance between words' form and meaning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.