ArticlePloS one2025
Comparing RNA extraction protocols from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded microcore samples.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to analyze intratumoral heterogeneity is of great interest for both diagnostic and basic research purposes. However, currently available dissection techniques are unsuitable for routine use and hard to access financially. Recently, a novel microcore-based dissection technique has been developed by the company Excilone for studying tissue heterogeneity in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) microcore samples. The use of FFPE biological samples for transcriptomic studies, coupled with their small size, remains a real barrier to dissection applications. The efficacy of five commercially available RNA extraction kits were analyzed on microcores collected from human and mice FFPE tissues. Thirty microcore samples of healthy tissue (human uterus and stomach, and murine liver and spleen) were collected and distributed equally and randomly to the five kits assessed. Microcores were collected directly from paraffin blocks using 200 µm inner diameter needles with a sample depth, variable regarding to tissue type, ranging from 450 to 600 µm. Overall RNA yield and RNA fragmentation were evaluated, and RT-qPCR analyses were carried out after deparaffinization and compared to non-deparaffinization protocols. RNA yields and RNA fragmentation varied considerably between kits and FFPE tissues analyzed. Although the main limitation of this technique is the small initial sample size, differences in qPCR efficiency were also observed. Interestingly, no significant differences were observed between deparaffinized and non-deparaffinized microcore samples. Ultimately, we demonstrate the feasibility of using FFPE microcore samples for sensitive molecular biology applications, both with and without deparaffinization. The importance of setting up an optimized workflow was emphasized by significant differences observed in outcomes of the different protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.