Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41359634›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Hydrogen peroxide fogging of isolation gowns: Disinfection efficacy and VOC emissions.

Shay Iyer, Zenhwa Ouyang, Arathi Vinayak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shay IyerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, VCA West Coast Specialty and Emergency Animal Hospital, Fountain Valley, California, United States of America.
Zenhwa OuyangIndependent Researcher, Ontario, Canada.
Arathi VinayakDepartment of Surgical Oncology, VCA West Coast Specialty and Emergency Animal Hospital, Fountain Valley, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3013-3310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolation gowns constitute the majority of the PPE waste generated daily worldwide. Disinfection with reuse that is easily reproducible without the need for expensive equipment or trained personnel is needed. This study evaluated the use of 9% hydrogen peroxide fogging using a commercially available fogger on isolation gowns heavily inoculated in the torso region of the gown with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli to challenge efficacy. Cultures were obtained on isolation gowns immediately after inoculation from both the interior as well as the exterior of the gowns before disinfection. Gowns were then fogged with 9% hydrogen peroxide (HP) for 1 min and 30sec. A four-hour trying time was instituted, and gowns were cultured from the torso region again. All cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 72 hours. CFU at 48- and 72-hours post-incubation were obtained. Safety of this methodology was studied by evaluating Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs) as a VOC index (1-500) as well as in parts per million (PPM) generated during HP fogging of gowns, aiming to determine whether the use of vacuum-aeration (VA) led to an improvement in VOCs generated. Results indicate that fogging with HP was effective at reducing S. epidermidis and E. coli as measured by CFU (100% reduction at 72 hours for both organisms). VOC index and PPM were greater without VA than with VA. The maximum Δ(IndexBC) (191) and Δ (PPMBC) (0.301) occurred at 90 minutes and then fell to between 156 and 187 for Δ (IndexBC) and 0.202 and 0.253 for Δ (PPMBC). This corresponded to 82% (156/191) and 98% (187/191) of the maximum VOC index and 67% (0.202/0.301) and 84% (0.253/0.301) of the maximum PPM without VA. Our results indicate that HP fogging may be a viable option for disinfection and reuse of single use isolation gowns and VA may be a valuable additional step in improving air quality during the process.

Indexed as

DisinfectantsDisinfectionHydrogen PeroxideVolatile Organic CompoundsEscherichia coliStaphylococcus epidermidisDisinfectantsHydrogen PeroxideVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID41359634
PMCPMC12685170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.