ArticlePloS one2025
Blood draw site and blood matrix influence mineral assessment.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating mineral concentrations are used to assess nutritional status or as markers for clinical conditions, but the quality of these measurements depends on the methods used for blood processing. Since the procedures for measuring mineral levels in blood are not standardized, discrepancies in sampling may influence the analytical results. We previously reported that zinc content in blood samples showed significant variation depending on several pre-analytical variables selected during blood collection and processing. In this study, we extend our analysis to determine how other mineral levels might be affected by different blood draw sites (capillary or venous) or sample matrices (plasma or serum). Sequential capillary and venous blood samples were collected from a diverse cohort of sixty healthy adults and analyzed for multiple minerals using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. Calcium, copper, iron, and magnesium were the only minerals that were detected in all samples and were free from contamination in the blood collection tubes used for the study. When assessing different blood draw sites, the concentrations of calcium, copper, iron, and magnesium were 2-11% higher from capillary compared to the venous plasma. When assessing different blood sample matrices, the concentrations of calcium, copper, and magnesium were 2-5% higher in serum compared to plasma samples, whereas the concentration of iron was 7% higher in plasma compared to serum samples. The differences observed in these four essential minerals from discrepant draw sites and blood matrices demonstrate the importance of controlling key pre-analytic variables when assessing mineral levels in blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.