Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41359613›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Exploring the development of coach-parent relationships in organized competitive youth team sports.

Sina Azimi, Jordan Sutcliffe, Katherine Tamminen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sina AzimiFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2528-5239
Jordan SutcliffeDepartment of Military Psychology and Leadership, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0636-7263
Katherine TamminenFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-4428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to gain a better understanding of coach-parent relationships in organized competitive youth team sports. Two qualitative studies were conducted with distinct samples from youth sports teams (U10-U15) within a large urban center in Ontario, Canada. Study 1 explored perceptions of key relationship-shaping factors among coaches (n = 21; 5 females, 16 males; age range: 22-64 years) and parents (n = 20; 6 females, 14 males; age range: 40-63 years). Identified factors included behavioural expectations, communication practices, trust, and pressures associated with professionalization. Study 2 (n = 20; 10 parents [9 females, 1 male] and 10 coaches [2 females, 8 males]) utilized grounded theory to propose a three-stage developmental model: (a) Introduction and discovery, (b) Curiosity, doubt, or stability, and (c) Engagement or separation. This model provides a clear framework illustrating how coach-parent interactions evolve, stabilize, or deteriorate, influenced by broader sociocultural and structural factors such as generational differences, organizational policies, and sport professionalization. Results emphasize the strategic importance for coaches and sport organizations in managing parent relationships and outline practical implications for enhancing these interactions. This research addresses an important gap by offering a theoretically grounded, developmental perspective on coach-parent dynamics in youth sport.

Indexed as

Competitive BehaviorParent-Child RelationsParentsYouth SportsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMentoringMiddle AgedOntarioYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41359613
PMCPMC12685178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.