ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Decolonizing infectious disease programs: A mixed methods analysis of a novel multi-country virtual training for Female Genital Schistosomiasis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing medical curricula and continuing professional development for infectious diseases have been largely driven by materials from higher-income countries and exclude teaching about FGS. In 2023, The Geneva Learning Foundation's peer learning-to-action model was used to create a multi-country virtual training program to address this gap and empower local healthcare workers in endemic countries. During Phase 1, participants learned about FGS and developed an action plan to address it. In Phase 2, participants received support in implementing their action plans. To explore the learning approach and its ability to reach a diverse set of health care workers, we conducted a mixed methods study framed in the theoretical lens of connectivism. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through online surveys, analyzed separately, and then integrated. Healthcare workers from 19 Francophone African countries, representing all levels of the health system, participated in Phase 1. Over two-thirds of Phase 1 participants reported an increase in FGS technical knowledge and trained 2,675 colleagues. About 85% of the Phase 1 participants found the peer review process beneficial, generating new ideas that strengthened their action planning. Phase 1 course completion was not significantly associated with profession or organization where a participant worked. Social/external connections led to personal growth and high-level professional impacts. The networks formed created valuable support systems for participants, and training certification led to opportunities for role expansion and promotion. 255 and 71 participants completed Phase 1 and 2, respectively. All participants reported engaging and teaching 49,088 community members about FGS. Peer connections and local knowledge exchange addressed immediate educational needs across health system levels and promoted local action. The virtual peer learning-to-action model successfully reached diverse learners, equipping them with knowledge they directly applied to challenging problems in their contexts, effectively decolonizing the approach to FGS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.