ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2025
Electrophysiological Methods to Assess Peripheral Pain Block in an Anesthetized Rat.
Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In vivo electrophysiological recordings from the lumbar region of the rat spine can be used to study the activation of sensory neural signals in the hindlimbs, as well as the efficacy of therapeutic interventions that interrupt ascending pain signals. Here, we describe the surgical procedures (laminectomy and sciatic nerve exposure), data collection, and analysis of two complementary electrophysiological signals: local field potential recordings and wide dynamic range single neuron recordings. Both differentiate activation of nerve fiber subclasses based on conduction velocity relative to an electrical stimulation pulse. Local field potentials (LFP) can differentiate between A α/β and C nerve fibers but cannot detect Aδ activity. They provide information about the global activation of the whole sciatic. Following electrical direct stimulation of the sciatic nerve using a J-cuff style bipolar electrode, area under the curve measurements of the two troughs corresponding to each component are calculated. Wide dynamic range (WDR) single neuron recordings assess the activity of a subset of sciatic activation, and can differentiate Aα/β, Aδ, and C fiber types. Electrical stimulation can be applied directly to the sciatic as with LFP, or via needle electrodes placed in the plantar surface of the hindpaw. This higher-frequency signal yields high signal-to-noise action potential spikes. Spike counts within predefined latency windows reflect the level of activity of the various fiber types. To date, these techniques have been used to assess the temporal properties of three different pain block modalities: Direct current electrical nerve block using a custom-made Carbon Separated Nerve Interface Electrode (CSINE), Kilohertz Frequency Alternating Current, and photobiomodulation using an 830 nm laser. This surgical preparation has been used for nerve block interventions for up to 5 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.