ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Comprehensive assessment of whole-genome sequencing-based variant calling pipelines in monozygotic twins.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRDsteer: quality-aware AI-driven closed-loop optimization enhances ctDNA-based minimal residual disease detection.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Overcoming LPS-mediated resistance in gram-negative pathogens: a review of LL-37 analogs and computational design strategies.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- The sequence alignment problem: boundary conditions as the unifying principle.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has emerged as a cornerstone technology in precision medicine, genetic diagnostics, and forensic identification. Compared to traditional capillary electrophoresis, WGS captures the entire genomic landscape and thus support high-resolution individual identification and even the differentiation of monozygotic (MZ) twins with nearly identical DNA contents. The minute genetic variation between MZ twins offer a rigorous paradigm for assessing the accuracy and sensitivity of different variant calling algorithms. Therefore, we benchmarked eight state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines using MZ twin genomes sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform at 30× and 60× coverage. The precision, robustness, efficiency, and concordance of these pipelines were systematically evaluated against a polymerase chain reaction-validated gold standard set of small variants for MZ twin discrimination. Our results indicated that DRAGEN read aligner combined with BCFtools achieved the optimal balance between accuracy and computationally efficiency, albeit with minor specificity and robustness tradeoffs. GATK HaplotypeCaller exhibited the highest accuracy and sensitivity among all tested pipelines, but required exceptionally high computational resources. DRAGEN and Strelka2 pipeline showcased superior robustness with the highest true-positive ratio and the lowest false-positive ratio. Collectively, these insights gained from the detection of subtle variations within highly similar genomes provide critical guidelines applicable to scenarios demanding high-precision variant calling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.