Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41359533›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2026

Diagnostic accuracy analysis for multiple raters using probit hierarchical model for ordinal ratings.

Yun Yang, Xiaoyan Lin, Kerrie P Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yun YangDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, USA.
Xiaoyan LinDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2348-7977
Kerrie P NelsonDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1195-8105

Funding

Improving Accuracy and Reliability in Cancer Screening TestsR01CA226805 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI NELSON, KERRIE P · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper delves into the realm of ordinal classification processes for multiple raters. A Probit hierarchical model is proposed linking rater's ordinal ratings with rater diagnostic skills (bias and magnifier) and patient latent disease severity, where patient latent disease severity is assumed to follow a latent class normal mixture distribution. This model specification provides closed-form expressions for both overall and individual rater receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under these ROC curves (AUC). We further extend the model by incorporating covariate information and adding a regression layer for rater diagnostic skill parameters and/or for patient latent disease severity. The extended covariate models also offer closed-form solutions for covariate-specific ROCs and AUCs. These analytical tools greatly facilitate traditional diagnostic accuracy analysis. We demonstrate our methods thoroughly with a practical mammography example.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMammographyROC CurveAUCdiagnostic biasdiagnostic magnifierdiagnostic scoredisease classdisease severityROC

Identifiers

PMID41359533
PMCPMC12783370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.