Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41359507›Full record

ArticleGenetics2026

Natural variation modifies centromere-proximal meiotic crossover frequency and segregation distortion in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Nicola Gorringe, Stephanie Topp, Robin Burns, Sota Yamaguchi, Fernando A Rabanal, Joiselle B Fernandes, Detlef Weigel, Tetsuji Kakutani, Matthew Naish, Ian R Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicola GorringeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.
Stephanie ToppDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.
Robin BurnsDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5709-3266
Sota YamaguchiDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.
Fernando A RabanalDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg D-72076, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1538-9752
Joiselle B FernandesDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.
Detlef WeigelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg D-72076, Germany.
Tetsuji KakutaniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Kantō 153-8902, Japan.
Matthew NaishDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.
Ian R HendersonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5066-1489

Funding

Broodbank FellowshipERC 101142254EvoPanCen UKRI/BBSRC DTPUKRI/BBSRC BB/V003984/1UKRI/BBSRC BB/Y009487/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic centromeres mediate chromosome segregation during cell division. Plant centromeres are loaded with CENH3-variant nucleosomes, which direct kinetochore formation and spindle-microtubule interaction. Centromeres are frequently composed of megabase-scale satellite repeat arrays, or retrotransposon nests. In monocentric genomes, such as the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, pericentromeric heterochromatin surrounds the CENH3-occupied satellite arrays. A zone of suppressed meiotic crossover recombination contains the centromere and extends into the pericentromeres. Here, we explore how natural variation in Arabidopsis influences centromere-proximal crossover frequency and segregation distortion when centromeres are heterozygous. We used fluorescent crossover reporters to quantify the effect of genetic variation on centromere-proximal recombination in 12 F1 hybrids between the reference strain Col-0 and nonreference accessions that captured Eurasian and relict diversity, and in total, we measured 3,037,802 meioses. The majority of the F1 hybrids (49 of 60) had significantly higher or lower centromere-proximal crossover frequency than inbreds. We relate hybrid crossover frequencies to patterns of nucleotide diversity and centromeric structural variation, and in a subset of 7 accessions, to epigenetic patterns of CENH3 enrichment and DNA methylation. Using linear modeling, we observed that chromosome and accession, and their interaction, together explained 85% of variation in crossover frequency, consistent with cis- and trans-acting modifying effects. The fluorescent reporters also allow segregation distortion through meiosis to be quantified between hybrids and inbreds. We observed a minority of hybrids (18 of 60) with distorted segregation through meiosis compared to inbreds, which occurred with or without a simultaneous change to centromere-proximal crossover frequency. Linear modeling revealed that 56% of variation in segregation distortion is explained by chromosome and accession, but with a stronger effect of accession compared to crossover frequency. We discuss how Arabidopsis centromeric structural heterozygosity may modify recombination and cause segregation distortion through meiosis.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCentromereChromosome SegregationCrossing Over, GeneticGenetic VariationMeiosisChromosomes, PlantArabidopsisCENH3centromereDNA methylationmeiosisnatural variationrecombinationsatellite repeatssegregation distortion

Identifiers

PMID41359507
PMCPMC13439696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.