ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2026
Leaf size in mosses is structurally constrained by cell dimensions and genome size.
Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anatomical drivers of organ size and trait coordinated association between pseudobulbs and roots in Dendrobium.Botanical studies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leaf anatomy is a key factor determining plant ecology. Cell size and number are related to leaf size in tracheophytes, but this has been little studied in bryophytes, which never reach large leaf sizes. We studied the main anatomical factors determining leaf size in mosses, and how this is related to their ecology. We measured cell and leaf dimensions in 287 moss species, as well as cell density, cell wall thickness and midrib length. These measurements were contrasted against different traits, highlighting growth form and genome size, and correlations among traits. Moss leaf size was positively correlated with cell size but negatively correlated with cell density. The longest moss leaves were always supported by midribs reaching or surpassing the leaf apex. Genome size was positively correlated with cell and, especially, leaf size. All these relationships were stronger in acrocarpous mosses. Leaf size in mosses is limited by the mechanical support provided by cell turgor and the midrib. Both mechanical support and effect of genome size were more important in acrocarpous mosses. Our findings suggest anatomy as a key linking factor between genome size and plant ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.