ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Dividing out quantification uncertainty enables assessment of differential transcript usage with limma and edgeR.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Real-Data-Driven Framework for Evaluating Differential Transcript Usage Methods Across Long-Read Bulk, Single-Cell, and Spatial Transcriptomics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- IsoformSwitchAnalyzeR v2: analysis of functional isoform changes in long-read and single-cell sequencing data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Cross-generational transcriptomic effects of alcohol use disorder in third generation offspring.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal bioinformatic analyses of genome-scale expression beyond gene-centric differential expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- A comprehensive evaluation of long-read de novo transcriptome assembly.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Elevated temperature simulating heatwaves restructures active nitrifying communities and associated viruses in tidal flats and agricultural soils.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Genetic associations and candidate functional genes linking depression and obesity: a multi-omics integrative study.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differential transcript usage (DTU) refers to changes in the relative abundance of transcript isoforms of the same gene between experimental conditions, even when the total expression of the gene does not change. DTU analysis requires the quantification of individual isoforms from RNA-seq data, which has a high level of uncertainty due to transcript overlap and read-to-transcript ambiguity (RTA). Popular DTU analysis methods do not directly account for the RTA overdispersion within their statistical frameworks, leading to reduced statistical power or poor error rate control, particularly in scenarios with small sample sizes. This article presents limma and edgeR analysis pipelines that account for RTA during DTU assessment. Leveraging recent advancements in the limma and edgeR Bioconductor packages, we propose DTU analysis pipelines optimized for small and large datasets with a unified interface via the diffSplice function. The pipelines make use of divided counts to remove RTA-induced dispersion from transcript isoform counts and account for the sparsity in transcript-level counts. Simulations and analyses of real data from mouse mammary epithelial cells demonstrate that the diffSplice pipelines provide greater power, improved efficiency, and improved false discovery rate control compared to existing specialized DTU methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.