ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Effectiveness and safety of the recombinant zoster vaccine in adults aged ≥50 years with inflammatory bowel disease.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brief report: Effectiveness and safety of recombinant zoster vaccine in inflammatory bowel disease patients aged 18 years and older: A matched cohort and self-controlled case series study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Herpes zoster vaccination in inflammatory bowel disease: Evidence, guidelines, and reality.World journal of virology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) face a higher risk of herpes zoster (HZ). We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in preventing HZ and the risk of flares post-immunization in adults aged ≥50 years with IBD. We conducted a matched cohort analysis at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. To evaluate VE, we included individuals aged ≥50 years with IBD who received 2 doses of RZV between 04/01/2018-12/31/2021 and followed them through 12/31/2022. These individuals were matched up to 1:3 to RZV-unvaccinated individuals on age, sex, race/ethnicity, condition (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease), IBD medication type, and index date (date of second dose among vaccinated individuals; same date assigned to unvaccinated match). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate VE. To evaluate safety, we used self-controlled case series analysis (SCCS). The relative risk (RR) of flare was estimated using conditional Poisson regression, comparing the incidence of chart-confirmed IBD new-onset flares in the risk (30 days after each dose) versus comparison periods among individuals with ≥1 dose. In the VE evaluation cohort (2-dose vaccinated: N = 872, unvaccinated: N = 2,550), overall adjusted VE in preventing HZ was 65.1% (95% CI, 24.8-83.8). In SCCS analysis, among 1,199 individuals who received ≥1 dose of RZV, there was no increased risk of IBD flare observed within 30 days after vaccination (RR: 0.80; 95% CI, 0.47-1.35). In adults aged ≥50 with IBD, 2 doses of RZV effectively prevented HZ without increasing flare risk. These findings support current vaccination recommendations to prevent HZ in adults ≥50 years, including individuals with immunodeficiency or immunosuppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.