ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Triage and workflow optimization with artificial intelligence in pediatric imaging.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prompting the future: artificial intelligence in pediatric radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models for Grading Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux on MCUG: A Preliminary Study.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly utilized in various aspects by the radiology department. With an ever-increasing burden on the healthcare system, particularly in emergency units, the need to incorporate AI in patient triage and workflow optimization cannot be overstated. Machine learning (ML)-based algorithms form the core of AI-based software, aiding healthcare professionals at nearly every step in delivering appropriate patient care. Regarding the radiology section of the hospital, AI-based algorithms have proven exceptionally useful in assisting radiologists and technicians with image acquisition. From accurate clinical referrals to scheduling computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scan appointments, from ensuring the lowest radiation exposure to offering timely follow-up reminders, ML-based software has indeed revolutionized the concept of modern image acquisition, especially in the pediatric radiology section. Although the implementation of these algorithms is swift, several technical challenges and the limited availability of pediatric datasets preclude their widespread use. The utility of multimodal pediatric datasets, which combine imaging, genomics, and clinical data, for comprehensive AI triage models can help AI systems evolve toward greater adaptability and integration, resulting in enhanced efficiency, reduced turnaround times, and improved patient outcomes in pediatric radiology departments in the future. In this article, we highlight and review the utility of AI and machine learning-based algorithms in efficiently aiding triage and streamlining the workflow in the pediatric radiology section, thereby ensuring an overall improvement in the departmental workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41359272What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.