ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Mean flow index (Mxa) algorithm option can influence cerebral autoregulation classification in critically ill septic patients.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Mean flow index (Mxa) is widely used to assess dynamic cerebral autoregulation in different clinical populations. This calculation is based on defined characteristics, including blocks, overlap periods, and epochs of the whole recordings. This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of different Mxa calculations, using variable blocks, overlap periods, and epochs. We retrospectively analyzed 50 transcranial Doppler recordings from septic shock patients, acquired within 48 h of ICU admission. Mxa was computed using eight signal-processing strategies that varied by block duration (5-10 s), overlap percentage (20%, 50%, 80%), and epoch length (3-5 min), as well as a continuous approach without epochs. Each configuration was labeled using the format epoch-block-overlap. Mxa values were compared using repeated measures analyses, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman plots, and polychoric correlation heatmaps. Median Mxa values ranged from 0.36 to 0.45 across configurations, with no statistically significant differences in within-patient comparisons (p > 0.05). ICCs demonstrated excellent agreement (ICC > 0.90) between approaches using the same epoch duration. Agreement declined modestly when comparing configurations with different epoch lengths (e.g., ICC = 0.782 between 3-10-50 and 5-10-50). Fixed-effects analysis did not identify any individual segmentation parameter as a significant source of variability. Mxa values calculated using different combinations of block, overlap, and epoch duration were consistent within patients, particularly when epoch length was maintained. These findings support the reproducibility of Mxa and suggest flexibility in processing strategies, provided methodological consistency is maintained. Further validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41359245What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.