ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026
Recognition and Perception of Registered Lebanese Midwives Regarding Ethical Dilemmas.
Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMidwives are frequently confronted with ethical dilemmas and require guidance in addressing them. This study investigates Lebanese midwives' recognition of and perception of ethical dilemmas in clinical practice, examines influencing factors and explores the role of internal policies and ethics committees.
methodsLebanese midwives who graduated between 2017 and 2021 and were registered in the Lebanese Order of Midwives participated in this qualitative and quantitative survey. In September 2022, three online focus groups were held via Zoom with sixteen participants answering validated questions. A quantitative survey was carried out Between October and December 2022.
resultsA total of 147 midwives completed the questionnaire. The most frequently reported ethical dilemmas involved disagreements within the team and with patients or families, followed by challenges related to patient autonomy. Among the ethical dilemmas studied, disagreement with patient or family, patient autonomy, and restrictive and hierarchical institutional regulations were found to be significantly associated with the support person sought by the midwives (p = 0.015, p = 0.037, and p = 0.045, respectively). The presence of an ethics committee was significantly associated with reliance on "moral perception and judgement" as a means of coping with ethical challenges (p < 0.001).
conclusionLebanese midwives regularly face ethical dilemmas, notably disagreements and patient autonomy issues. The presence of an ethics committee significantly aids their moral judgement, highlighting the need for institutional structures that guide ethical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41359205What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.