Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41359196›Full record

ReviewLung2025

Acute Right Ventricular Failure in the Medical ICU.

Amos E Dodi, Mark Jacobs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amos E DodiDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210 Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA. adodi@montefiore.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4340-407X
Mark JacobsDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210 Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a complex clinical syndrome resulting from anatomical and physiological dysfunction of the right ventricle, marked by insufficient cardiac output state, elevated filling pressures, and elevated central venous pressures. Historically, acute RVF in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) has posed significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, often leading to poor patient outcomes and increased healthcare utilization. RVF is a pervasive and critically underdiagnosed condition in MICUs, often masked by nonspecific symptoms and overlooked in favor of left-sided pathology, despite its profound impact on patient outcomes and mortality. This difficulty stems from a limited understanding of its underlying mechanisms and a lack of high-quality evidence to guide management in critical care settings. Effective care for RVF demands early recognition, precise identification of the underlying etiology, and prompt, targeted interventions. Intensivists must possess comprehensive knowledge and a diverse skill set to navigate these complexities and address unforeseen complications. Over the past two decades, advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies have transformed the approach to RVF, driving significant progress in the field. This review explores the historical evolution, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and contemporary management strategies for RVF in the MICU.

Indexed as

Critical CareHeart FailureIntensive Care UnitsVentricular Dysfunction, RightAcute DiseaseHumansVentricular Function, RightCritical careIntensive care unitPulmonary embolismPulmonary hypertensionRight heart failureRight ventricular failure

Identifiers

PMID41359196
PMCPMC12686036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.