ReviewLung2025
Acute Right Ventricular Failure in the Medical ICU.
Review in Lung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Right Ventricle in Cardiac Critical Care: Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a complex clinical syndrome resulting from anatomical and physiological dysfunction of the right ventricle, marked by insufficient cardiac output state, elevated filling pressures, and elevated central venous pressures. Historically, acute RVF in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) has posed significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, often leading to poor patient outcomes and increased healthcare utilization. RVF is a pervasive and critically underdiagnosed condition in MICUs, often masked by nonspecific symptoms and overlooked in favor of left-sided pathology, despite its profound impact on patient outcomes and mortality. This difficulty stems from a limited understanding of its underlying mechanisms and a lack of high-quality evidence to guide management in critical care settings. Effective care for RVF demands early recognition, precise identification of the underlying etiology, and prompt, targeted interventions. Intensivists must possess comprehensive knowledge and a diverse skill set to navigate these complexities and address unforeseen complications. Over the past two decades, advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies have transformed the approach to RVF, driving significant progress in the field. This review explores the historical evolution, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and contemporary management strategies for RVF in the MICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.