ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Tokyo.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDiagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are essential for optimizing radiation dose in CT examinations. However, current DRLs may not reflect the performance of CT scanners or the background of individual facilities, potentially leading to misleading dose indicators. Furthermore, the factors that influence DRLs remain unclear. This study aims to investigate how facility characteristics and CT scanner performance affect DRLs. MATERIALS AND
methodsA dose survey was conducted in 2023 targeting 982 medical facilities in Tokyo. Data were collected from 100 facilities and 176 CT scanners, focusing on adult patients (50-70 kg) undergoing common CT protocols. CTDIvol and DLP were analyzed, and the 75th percentile was defined as the Tokyo-DRL. Factors potentially influencing DRLs, including the presence of radiologists, certified CT technologists, hospital size, CT scanner specifications, and image reconstruction methods, were systematically evaluated.
resultsThe Tokyo-DRLs were lower than Japan's 2020 DRLs across all protocols, likely reflecting advancements in CT technology and staff expertise. Radiation doses were lower in facilities with radiologists and certified CT technologists, more hospital beds, wider scan beam widths, and use of iterative reconstruction or deep learning-based reconstruction. For dual-energy CT, DRLs were established only for the pulmonary artery with contrast due to limited data. Multivariate analysis revealed key dose-influencing factors such as tube current modulation and scan sequence in the head, and beam width in trunk scanning.
conclusionFacility characteristics and scanner performance significantly impact radiation dose. Periodic, detailed surveys are necessary to update DRLs in line with evolving technologies and clinical practice. KEY POINTS: Question How do facility characteristics and CT scanner performance influence diagnostic reference levels in clinical CT examinations? Findings Radiation doses in CT examinations varied significantly depending on facility size, staff expertise, scanner specifications, and image reconstruction methods. Clinical relevance Identification of facility and scanner characteristics enables more effective radiation dose optimization, enhancing patient safety without compromising diagnostic quality in CT imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41359161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.