Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41359159›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Machine learning models for CT-based classification of ischemic stroke onset time within or beyond 4.5 h: a comparison of approaches.

Laura M van Poppel, Lucas de Vries, Mahsa Mojtahedi, Manon Kappelhof, Susanne G H Olthuis, Robert van Oostenbrugge, Wim H van Zwam, Pieter Jan van Doormaal, Ludo F M Beenen, Yvo B W E M Roos and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Laura M van PoppelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.m.vanpoppel@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7921-2353
Lucas de VriesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mahsa MojtahediDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Manon KappelhofDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susanne G H OlthuisDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht UMC+, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Robert van OostenbruggeDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht UMC+, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Wim H van ZwamDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht UMC+, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pieter Jan van DoormaalDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ludo F M BeenenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yvo B W E M RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk A MarqueringDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart J EmmerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Hartstichting CVON2015-01: CONTRASTHersenstichting HA2015.01.06Ministerie van Economische Zaken PPP Allowance LSHM17016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare machine learning models using different combinations of clinical and imaging variables for classifying ischemic stroke patients as having an onset-to-imaging (OTI) time within or beyond 4.5 h. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed 993 patients with known OTI time from the MR CLEAN Registry and LATE trial. Data were split into training and test sets (80:20). We developed models using various combinations of variables to classify OTI time, including clinical-radiological information, and variables automatically extracted from segmented ischemic regions on non-contrast CT, such as net water uptake (NWU), lesion volume, and radiomics features. Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsOf 993 patients, 199 (20%) presented beyond 4.5 h. The model including only clinical-radiological scores, and the one including only NWU, achieved an AUC of 0.65. Performance was higher for models that included NWU combined with lesion volume or clinical-radiological scores (AUCs ranging from 0.70 to 0.75). Radiomics-based models achieved the highest performance with AUCs of 0.81, significantly outperforming NWU-based models. Key predictors for identifying patients beyond 4.5 h included homogeneous lesion textures in both core and hypoperfused areas, smaller hypoperfused area volumes, higher core NWU, and lower baseline NIHSS scores.

conclusionWe found that radiomics-based models outperform models including NWU measurements for classifying stroke OTI time in this endovascular therapy population. The superior performance suggests that texture, shape, and intensity patterns of ischemic lesions may capture more information about lesion age than single metrics like NWU. External validation in broader stroke populations is needed to establish clinical utility. KEY POINTS: Question Which combinations of clinical and CT-derived variables enable the most accurate classification of stroke onset time within versus beyond 4.5 h using machine learning? Findings Models using radiomics features achieved superior accuracy (AUC 0.81) compared to models using net water uptake measurements (AUC 0.65) for onset time classification. Clinical relevance Automated CT-based radiomics models enable accurate stroke onset time classification without advanced imaging, potentially expanding treatment options for patients with unknown symptom onset times in centers lacking MRI capabilities.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesTime FactorsBrainMachine learningRadiomicsStrokeTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.