ArticleVeterinary research communications2025
Seroprevalence of pathogenic leptospira in domiciled and stray dogs from subtropical Mexico.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leptospirosis is a zoonotic bacterial disease of public health concern. Dogs are hosts that can carry and eliminate diverse serovars of Leptospira for long periods. Available vaccines can protect against only two to four serovars of Leptospira, and some additional virulent serovars not included in the vaccines may circulate in the environment. The objective of this study was to estimate the seroprevalence of circulating Leptospiras in owned vaccinated, owned unvaccinated, and stray dogs, and to assess the risk factors associated with the presence of antibodies. Owned vaccinated, and owned unvaccinated dogs were selected, which were randomly recruited from different veterinary clinics, and a questionnaire was given to their owners to obtain their background; samples from stray dogs were obtained from the animal control center of the municipality of Merida. The MAT test against 11 serovars was used. A total of 335 samples were obtained, 215 from domiciled dogs and 120 from stray dogs. The seroprevalence was 34.02% (33/97) in vaccinated domiciled dogs, 38.98% (46/118) in nonvaccinated domiciled dogs and 39.16% (47/120) in stray dogs. The main serovars found were Australis, Bratislava, Autumnalis, and Pyrogenes in the three groups of dogs. A high seroprevalence of Leptospira spp. was detected in all groups of evaluated dogs including pathogenic serovars not serovars not contained in the commercial vaccines; since no relevant risk factors were detected all pet and stray dogs are at the same risk to become in contact with pathogenic leptospiras.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41359150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.