ArticleUrolithiasis2025
Automatic detection of urinary stones from non-contrast enhanced computed tomography images.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on: Automatic detection of urinary stones from non-contrast enhanced computed tomography images.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary stones, one of the most common emergency conditions, traverse the ureter, urine flow is obstructed, resulting in hydronephrosis and severe pain. However, vessel wall calcifications or phleboliths are frequently observed in abdominal and pelvic regions and distinguishing them from urinary stones can be challenging. This study was performed to implement deep learning techniques, specifically utilizing the UROAID (UROlothiasis AssIsted Diagnosis system) model, to detect urinary stones within the urinary tract. Noncontrast abdominopelvic computed topographies (CT) performed on adult patients at the emergency departments of the two tertiary academic hospitals were collected. The ROI Extraction and KUB Segmentation algorithms were a modified version of Uro-UNETR. The 3D labelling map and 3D stone classification were individual outputs that were then merged with the results from the Urinary System Estimation module in the UROAID detection module. In total, the CT scans of 6659 patients were included in the study. An accuracy of 0.9585 and an F1 score of 0.9605 were achieved using an ensemble model alongside a stone classification module that we also proposed to further improve the performance. The detection rate of UROAID for stones by location was highest for stones in the kidney, with a rate of 99.0%, followed by the proximal ureter (99.1%), middle ureter (98.0%), distal ureter (96.4%), and urinary bladder (91.3%). This study designed UROAID, an ensemble model of a segmentation-based stone detection module and a stone classification module, to follow the process of a radiologist accurately diagnosing urinary stones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41359136What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.