ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
Synoptic reporting : Chances and challenges for secondary use of pathology data in biobanking.
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA high quality of biosample-associated data (DQ) is critical for biomedical research. Synoptic reporting (SR) provides the chance to increase DQ for the secondary use of data from surgical pathology (SP) in Germany. Hence, it is of high interest for biobanks that data-providing SP departments force the implementation of SR. MATERIALS AND
methodsSynoptic reporting is already implemented in some use cases [1]. Recommendations for how to proceed are available [2-4]. Central efforts-such as the DGP's AG Semantik-are carried out to support standardisation in SR.
resultsSuccessful use of SR requires efforts from SP departments as well as from biobanks. Firstly, it requires revision of processes in SP departments. This also applies to the similar tissue assessment processes in biobanks. Secondly, biobanks need to prepare by implementing the required standards such as FHIR and SNOMED CT.
conclusionCommon efforts in SP departments and biobanks are required to facilitate the utmost benefits of SR for DQ in patient care and research. Biobanks can serve as a platform for SP departments to attempt new processes that implement SR and can provide independent feedback on DQ in SP departments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41359124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.