ArticleUrolithiasis2025
A novel preoperative risk score for predicting Urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: validation and clinical application.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative predictors of urinary tract infections after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.World journal of nephrology · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor: A novel preoperative risk score for predicting Urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: validation and clinical application.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- Comment on "A novel preoperative risk score for predicting urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: validation and clinical application".Urolithiasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common and serious complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).This study develops and validates the PuRass scoring system to predict the risk of UTI, including urinary sepsis, after PCNL and support personalized clinical Management. A retrospective analysis of 293 PCNL patients was conducted, incorporating multiple risk factors, including gender, age, diabetes, preoperative white blood cell count, urine analysis and culture results, stone size and type, and the degree of hydronephrosis. Significant risk factors were identified through meta-analysis and integrated into PuRass, with each factor weighted according to its odds ratio (OR) value to establish a quantitative risk assessment model. Results showed that gender, age, diabetes, elevated white blood cell count, and positive urine analysis and culture results significantly increased the risk of post-PCNL UTI. The PuRass model demonstrated excellent predictive performance in ROC curve analysis, achieving 90% sensitivity and 89.4% specificity, with an optimal threshold of 8.5 points. Early intervention strategies based on PuRass effectively reduced infection rates and hospital stays in high-risk patients. This study indicates that PuRass provides a reliable tool for predicting and managing post-PCNL UTI. Future multicenter studies will further validate its clinical applicability and explore its integration with emerging technologies to enhance postoperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41359118What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.