ArticleUrolithiasis2025
Under pressure: what we thought we knew about gravity irrigation in flexible ureteroscopy.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Urinary Tract Infectious Complications After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: The RIRS-STAMP Risk Score from a Two-Center Cohort.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research progress on treating urinary system stones using ureteroscopy combined With a negative-pressure suction sheath.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study revisits the physical principles of gravity-based irrigation in flexible ureteroscopy (fURS), assessing the effects of bag height, reference level, working channel occupancy, bag depletion, and drip chamber configuration on irrigation flow and pressure. An in vitro model was constructed with two 3-L saline bags connected to a Y-end system and a LithoVue™ fURS. Flow rates (mL/min) were measured at five heights (0-200 cm H₂O) using three reference levels: bag top, outflow, and drip chamber. Four working channel conditions were tested (free, 150 μm laser fiber, 200 μm fiber, and 1.9 Fr basket). Additional experiments examined bag volumes (3 L to near empty) and drip chamber content (air vs. fluid). Irrigation pressure at the ureteroscope tip was recorded via a water column. Flow increased proportionally with bag height and was lowest when referenced from the bag top. Channel occupancy markedly reduced flow, with no measurable flow at 0 cm when referenced from the top. Bag depletion and drip chamber air content had negligible influence, even in empty bags. Pressure recordings revealed a negative pressure in depleting bags, and the bag top correlated most closely with ureteroscope pressure. This confirms that gravity irrigation follows hydrostatic principles. Bag height and channel occupancy are the primary determinants of flow, whereas bag volume and drip chamber configuration exert minimal influence. The saline bag top best reflects irrigation pressure and should be the reference level. Negative pressures of 7-8 cm H₂O in depleting bags minimally affected flow but may impact intrarenal pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41359107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.