ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2025
Global Measures of HIV Care Accessibility Across Urban, Suburban, and Rural Areas.
Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Navigating Adversity: Psychosocial Transformation, Service Advocacy, and End-of-Life Perceptions Among Family Caregivers of PLWHA During Inpatient Treatment in Hunan, China.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in HIV treatment, disparities in healthcare access remain across low-income (LIC), middle-income (MIC), and high-income (HIC) countries, limiting access to clinical care, antiretroviral therapy, and viral load testing. This study developed the HIV Care Access Index (HIV-CAI) to measure and compare HIV care service access across countries and within geographic regions and examined associations with economic and health indicators. A cross-sectional survey was conducted between August 2021 and June 2023 across nine countries: Botswana, China, Colombia, Kenya, Nigeria, Puerto Rico, South Africa, Thailand, and the United States. Participants were adults living with HIV recruited from urban, suburban, and rural settings through HIV service organizations, sexual and gender minority centers, and resource-limited communities. The HIV-CAI was scored from 0 to 1 (worst to best access) across three domains: Access to HIV Clinical Care and Providers, Access to HIV Medication, and Access to Viral Load Testing. Among 1,598 participants, Botswana demonstrated the highest HIV care access (0.93), followed by Thailand (0.91) and Kenya (0.90), while Nigeria showed the lowest access (0.64). Access to HIV medication was relatively consistent across regions, whereas access to clinical care and providers was limited, particularly in rural areas. Countries with higher HIV burden, incidence, and prevalence were associated with better care access. The HIV-CAI reveals disparities in HIV care access across geographic areas. Future interventions should prioritize improving equitable access, particularly in rural areas and countries with lower overall access scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.