Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41359065›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025

Imageless robotic-assisted system is associated to effective restoration of the joint line and posterior condylar offset in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Grant H Cabell, Crystal Jing, Rafeal L Baker, David G Deckey, Kevin A Wu, Matthew K Stein, Thorsten M Seyler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Grant H CabellDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke Medical Center, Durham, United States. grant.cabell@duke.edu.
Crystal JingSchool of Medicine, Duke Medical Center, Durham, United States. crystal.jing@duke.edu.
Rafeal L BakerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke Medical Center, Durham, United States.
David G DeckeyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke Medical Center, Durham, United States. david.deckey@gmail.com.
Kevin A WuSchool of Medicine, Duke Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Matthew K SteinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke Medical Center, Durham, United States.
Thorsten M SeylerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke Medical Center, Durham, United States. thorsten.seyler@duke.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRevision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) rates are rising. Novel technologies such as imageless robotic-assisted systems have been created to increase accuracy and precision during these difficult cases, though there is a lack of evidence detailing the effectiveness of these systems. The efficacy of imageless robotic-assisted rTKA in restoring joint line and other radiographic measurements, intra-operative outcomes, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated in this study. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective review of patients undergoing rTKA using an imageless robotic-assisted system. Patients undergoing rTKA for both aseptic and septic failures were included. Demographics, intraoperative data, radiographic outcomes, and PROMs including Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference, PROMIS Physical Function, PROMIS Depression and Knee Injury, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were analyzed. All patients received at least 1 year of follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative weight-bearing hip-to-ankle calibrated radiographs were used to assess joint line restoration using the adductor tubercle as a reference point. Posterior condylar offset (PCO) was measured on calibrated preoperative and postoperative lateral weightbearing films.

resultsA total of 84 patients were included. Postoperative mean VAS pain (p < 0.0001), PROMIS Pain Interference (p = 0.03), and PROMIS Depression (p = 0.03) demonstrated improvement compared to preoperative scores. KOOS decreased in the postoperative period (p = 0.0006). The joint line was restored within 5 mm of the contralateral side in 77.4% (n = 65/84 patients) of patients. Postoperative and preoperative PCO to femoral diaphysis ratios were similar (ratio = 0.83 and 0.83, respectively). One-year complication rates were low amongst this patient cohort, with notable mean length of hospital stay of 2.3 ± 2.5 days and 88.1% (n = 74/84) of patients discharging home.

conclusionsPatients undergoing rTKA with an imageless robotic-assisted system demonstrated adequate joint line restoration, maintenance of the PCO, improvement in pain scores, and low rates of post-operative complications. Further research is needed to directly investigate how imageless robotic-assisted rTKA may lead to quicker, safer discharge from the hospital as compared to conventional rTKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee JointRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresReoperationRetrospective StudiesImageless roboticsJoint linePosterior condylar offsetRevision total knee arthroplastyRobotic total knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.