ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Evaluating adverse events of antibacterials in infants: insights from FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) data.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses a significant gap in evaluations of the safety of antibacterial drugs in infants aged 0-1 year on the basis of a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis. We use data spanning the period from 2005Q1 to 2025Q1, which we obtain from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to retrospectively assess adverse events (AEs) associated with three commonly used antibacterials-vancomycin, cefotaxime, and gentamicin-in this vulnerable population. A total of 698 cases of AE were included in the study. Disproportionality analyses (which rely on the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional odds ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS)) revealed significant AE signals with multiple testing correction using a 5% false discovery rate: vancomycin and gentamicin were predominantly associated with acute kidney injury (n = 50, ROR = 16.18, 95% CI 12.13-21.59, P = 3.16e - 41; n = 12, ROR = 21.18, 95% CI 11.82-37.95, P = 1.95e - 12), whereas cefotaxime was linked to increased alanine aminotransferase (n = 4, ROR = 7.72, 95% CI 2.87-20.75, P = 0.002) and aspartate aminotransferase levels (n = 4, ROR = 7.51, 95% CI 2.79-20.19, P = 0.002), thus indicating liver injury. Gentamicin was also associated with neurosensory deafness (n = 6, ROR = 146.47, 95% CI 63.31-338.83, P = 8.85e - 12). A Weibull distribution analysis of onset timing showed that the risk of AEs for all three antibacterials remained consistent over time. These findings underscore the increased vulnerability of infants to drug toxicity. These results emphasize the critical need for cautious, individualized risk-benefit assessments in the context of prescribing antibacterials to infant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.