ReviewIntensive care medicine2026
Current standard of care for septic shock.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hyperoncotic Albumin (20%) Versus Crystalloids for Mortality in Adults with Sepsis and Septic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Tissue-Resident Macrophage in Inflammation and Cancer.MedComm · 2026Review
- Activity and Outcomes of a Multidisciplinary Sepsis Unit: Fifty Thousand Consultations over Thirteen Years.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Predictor of 90-Day Mortality in Surgical Sepsis Patients with Acute Kidney Injury-A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the MIMIC-IV Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness of Methylene Blue in Adult Shock: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Lactate and lactylation in sepsis: regulation of immune-metabolic crosstalk and organ injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Using the 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines in Practice.Critical care science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is a syndrome of life-threatening organ dysfunction that results from dysregulated host response to infection, with septic shock defined as persistent hypotension despite fluid resuscitation, a serum lactate > 2 mmol/L and the need for a vasopressor infusion to maintain a mean arterial pressure of at least 65 mmHg. Approximately, 49 million cases of sepsis are recorded worldwide annually, with 11 million sepsis-related deaths, the majority occurring in patients with septic shock. A substantial proportion of survivors suffer from moderate to severe functional limitations including physical, cognitive and psychological disability, exacerbation of pre-existing chronic conditions and a high incidence of re-hospitalisation in the first 12 months after the initial diagnosis. Optimal management of patients with septic shock requires prompt and reliable recognition of patients with sepsis who require additional haemodynamic support. Initially, patients will need judicious intravenous fluids and consideration of the need for vasopressors such as norepinephrine. Administration of appropriate antibiotics and consideration for control of the source of infection are also required. In the optimisation phase, depending on patients' comorbidities and response to therapy, the balance of fluid therapy, vasopressors and potentially the addition of an inotropic agent will need to be adjusted, based on clinical findings and haemodynamic and biochemical parameters. For those patients who do not respond to initial therapy, more intensive monitoring may be required with consideration of adjunctive therapies such as corticosteroids, vasopressin, angiotensin II or other rescue therapies to achieve cardiovascular stability. Once stability has been achieved, clinicians need to consider strategies to ameliorate the potential long-term effects on survivors, while keeping in mind the perspective and experience of their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41359028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.