Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358968›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2026

Health challenges of older women following attempted intimate partner homicide.

Hila Avieli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hila AvieliDepartment of Criminology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0341-6058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesWhile some research exists on women who have survived attempted intimate partner homicide (IPH), studies focusing on survivors aged 60 years and older and how they cope with health concerns remain scarce. Guided by intersectionality as a theoretical framework, this study examined older women's experiences of managing their health in the aftermath of surviving a violent attack by a male partner, considering how intersecting identities such as age, gender, and survivorship shape their health-related challenges. The insights gained could inform targeted interventions and policies to address this population's unique vulnerabilities and care needs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsInterpretative phenomenological analysis methodology was used to conduct in-depth, semi-structured interviews with nine older women who had survived an attempted IPH. A purposeful sampling strategy was employed to identify women who had been legally or medically classified as survivors of attempted intimate partner homicide and self-identified as such. The interviews, guided by an interview guide, were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed to elicit the main themes.

resultsThree themes emerged from the participants' narratives: (a) the ripple effect of the injury, (b) reduced access to formal and informal health-related support systems, and (c) limited financial resources for recovery needs. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The interplay of chronic health conditions, minimal support networks, and financial constraints highlights how advancing age, traumatic histories, and systemic healthcare gaps are mutually exacerbating. These findings underscore the value of integrated, age-conscious, and trauma-informed services and theoretical frameworks that address the complete spectrum of older survivors' healthcare needs.

Indexed as

HomicideIntimate Partner ViolenceSurvivorsAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchHealthIntersectionalityIntimate partner homicideOlder womenQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID41358968
PMCPMC13604828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.