Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358955›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2026

An exploratory semantic analysis of age-related stereotypes in OpenAI's GPT 4o model.

Wan Hong, Moon Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wan HongGraduate School of Science and Technology Policy, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0005-3625-4621
Moon ChoiGraduate School of Science and Technology Policy, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8002-0113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesGenerative artificial intelligence, particularly large language models (LLMs), is increasingly used to navigate information, potentially shaping users' perceptions of different social groups. This study examines age-related stereotypes in LLM-generated text using natural language processing (NLP) techniques. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsTo ensure neutrality, extensive pilot testing was conducted to craft a prompt that did not elicit bias yet generated coherent responses. The final prompt, "Describe the personality of a [AGE]-year-old person," was used with OpenAI's GPT-4o API in February 2025, varying AGE from 10 to 90 in 10-year increments. The analysis was guided by the Stereotype Content Model, which assesses social cognition along two key dimensions: warmth (sociability, morality) and competence (ability, assertiveness). Scores were quantified using sentence embeddings.

resultsText similarity and stereotype content analyses revealed three age clusters, with older adults showing the most internal consistency. Descriptions of individuals aged 60 years and above featured relatively higher warmth but lower competence compared to younger groups. Notably, positive assertiveness terms were rarely used to describe older adults. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest that GPT-4o may embed subtle age-related stereotypes, even when using largely positive language. These patterns potentially influence user perceptions through repeated exposure. Future research should investigate the mechanisms behind these biases and explore mitigation strategies to promote more age-inclusive artificial intelligence-generated content.

Indexed as

AgingArtificial IntelligenceNatural Language ProcessingSemanticsStereotypingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAgeismBiasGenerative artificial intelligenceLarge language model

Identifiers

PMID41358955
PMCPMC13148887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.