Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358918›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2026

Explainable AI-Driven Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting HIV Viral Nonsuppression in Ugandan Patients: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Francis Ngema, Albert Whata, Micheal O Olusanya, Siyabonga Mhlongo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francis Ngema *Centre of Applied Data Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0903-6491
Albert Whata *Department of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-3491
Micheal O Olusanya *Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Sol Plaatje University, Kimberley, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8854-7822
Siyabonga Mhlongo *Department of Applied Information Systems, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8203-5984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV viral suppression is essential for improving health outcomes and reducing transmission rates among people living with HIV. In Uganda, where HIV/AIDS is a major public health concern, machine learning (ML) models can predict viral suppression effectively. However, the limited use of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods affects model transparency and clinical utility.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and compare ML models for predicting viral nonsuppression in Ugandan people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy (ART), and then systematically apply comprehensive XAI techniques to the best-performing model to identify key predictors and demonstrate interpretability at both population and individual patient levels.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical and demographic data from 1101 Ugandan people living with HIV on ART at the HIV clinic in Muyembe Health Centre IV between June 2016 and April 2018, focusing on predicting viral nonsuppression (viral load >1000 copies per milliliter). The dataset was divided into model-building (training: 80%) and validation (test: 20%) sets. To address class imbalance, the synthetic minority over-sampling technique was applied. For global explanation, 8 ML algorithms-logistic regression, stacked ensemble, random forest, support vector machines, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbors, naïve Bayes, and artificial neural networks-were compared. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F

resultsThe XGBoost ensemble model demonstrated superior performance with an accuracy of 0.89, precision of 0.59, recall of 0.65, and AUC of 0.80. The model achieved high specificity (0.93) and moderate sensitivity, yielding a Cohen κ of 0.55 and F

conclusionsThe XGBoost model demonstrated optimal performance for predicting viral nonsuppression among Ugandan people living with HIV on ART, achieving an AUC of 0.80. Comprehensive XAI analysis identified adherence assessment as the primary predictor, followed by age group, residence type, and ART duration. XAI methods provided transparent interpretation of model predictions at both population and individual patient levels, enabling identification of key risk factors for targeted clinical interventions in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

adherenceantiretroviral therapyartificial intelligenceclinical decision-makingexplainable AIextreme gradient boostingHIV viral suppressionmachine learningpredictive modelingpublic healthUgandaXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41358918
PMCPMC12820540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.