Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358900›Full record

ReviewDiabetes care2026

9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07687368 (Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 141 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07687368 nacompletednot on this map

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Intensive Care Units of Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (CGM-UCI23)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i SunyerRan2025 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsCritical Care Nursing, Critical Illness, Critical Care, Intensive Care, HyperglycaemiaArmsContinuous Glucose Monitoring, Conventional Glucose Measurement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Clinical pharmacology of antidiabetic drugs: an update.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusGlycemic ControlHypoglycemic AgentsStandard of CareBlood GlucoseHumansBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID41358900
PMCPMC12690185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.