Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358691›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026

Functional alignment in robotic total knee arthroplasty provides favourable outcomes and minimal early revisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vasileios Giovanoulis, Angelo V Vasiliadis, Luca Andriollo, Pietro Gregori, Konstantinos Dretakis, Christos Koutserimpas, Sébastien Lustig

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Functional alignment: Defined personalized alignment strategy with promising outcomes and room for improvement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vasileios GiovanoulisDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
Angelo V VasiliadisDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
Luca AndriolloDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
Pietro GregoriDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
Konstantinos Dretakis2nd Department of Orthopaedics, Hygeia General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Christos KoutserimpasDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-9626
Sébastien LustigDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFunctional alignment (FA) has emerged as a personalised alignment strategy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), enabled by robotic-assisted technology. Although early clinical results are encouraging, evidence remains heterogeneous and long-term safety is uncertain. This systematic review aimed to evaluate functional outcomes, and early revision risk of robotic-assisted TKA performed under FA principles with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

methodsThis review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251134340). PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus were searched up to August 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients undergoing robotic-assisted primary TKA with FA, reporting outcomes at ≥2 years' follow-up. Data on demographics, robotic system, implant type, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), complications, and revision rates were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB 2 and ROBINS-I. A random-effects single-arm meta-analysis of pooled proportions was performed for early aseptic revision risk.

resultsTwenty studies (5155 TKAs) were included, with a weighted mean follow-up of 2.5 years. All procedures were performed using the image-based robotic system. Postoperative PROMs were consistently high: Knee Society Score (KSS) Knee 92.4-94.5, KSS Function 91.4-93.4, and FJS 74.8-77.5. Kujala scores indicated minimal anterior knee pain (88.1-93.2). ROM improved from a mean preoperative flexion of 119.3° to 123°-124.8°. Complications were infrequent, most commonly stiffness requiring manipulation under anaesthesia. Across all cohorts, 18 aseptic revisions were reported (pooled proportion 0.35%, 95% CI 0.23-0.55). The single-arm meta-analysis of pooled proportions showed a negligible pooled early revision risk (rounded to 0.00; 95% CI 0.00-0.01; I² = 0%). Outcomes were comparable across age, gender, fixation type, and implant constraint, although obese patients accounted for all mechanical failures.

conclusionRobotic-assisted TKA performed under FA principles yields favourable short- to mid-term functional outcomes and a low rate of early aseptic revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansKnee ProsthesisPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRange of Motion, ArticularReoperationTreatment Outcomefunctional alignmentfunctional knee positioningpersonalised alignmentrobotic kneerobotic TKA

Identifiers

PMID41358691
PMCPMC13502434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.