ReviewTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
Stewardship of Molecular Diagnostics in Transplant Viral Infections.
Review in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stewardship of Molecular Diagnostics in Transplant Viral Infections.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transplant environment requires special considerations when testing for viral infections as immunosuppression results in atypical infection profiles. Microbes otherwise considered commensals or causing mild disease can lead to severe infections in transplant environments. Therefore, guidelines tend to recommend broader microbial testing in these populations. In parallel, advances in molecular diagnostics have led to the availability of a wide selection of tests, including highly multiplexed nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and direct next generation sequencing (NGS) based options. These newer technologies may provide information on many potential pathogens simultaneously, more rapidly, and while avoiding invasive specimen collection procedures. However, they are generally more expensive than conventional methods such as culture, and nucleic acid detection of multiple potential pathogens may be nonspecific and confuse the diagnosis. Navigating the complexity of the available molecular test landscape in immunocompromised patients is an opportunity for diagnostic stewardship. Here we discuss the clinical value of different molecular testing strategies for diagnosis of viral infectious diseases in immunocompromised transplant patients using several common transplant infection syndromes as a framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.