Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358538›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Seasonal effects of farmer-managed livestock grazing exclusions on bird communities in Burkina Faso.

Ian Quintas, Gabriel Marcacci, Ambroise N Zongo, Pius Korner, Alexandra Kuttnig, Reto Spaar, Bakary Diakité, Franziska Kaguembèga-Müller, Alain Jacot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Seasonal effects of farmer-managed livestock grazing exclusions on bird communities in Burkina Faso.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ian QuintasSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.
Gabriel MarcacciSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2199-0141
Ambroise N ZongoAssociation tiipaalga, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Pius KornerSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.
Alexandra KuttnigDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Reto SpaarSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.
Bakary DiakitéAssociation tiipaalga, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Franziska Kaguembèga-MüllerAssociation tiipaalga, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Alain JacotSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities such as livestock grazing and deforestation are primary causes of land degradation in drylands such as the Sahel Zone of Africa, threatening the livelihoods of rural communities and biodiversity. To restore degraded habitats, measures such as farmer-managed livestock grazing exclusion, where the native vegetation is protected and can naturally regenerate, have been implemented. Yet the benefits of such measures for biodiversity remain poorly understood, especially in regions that experience strong seasonality. Here, we used passive acoustic monitoring to study how livestock grazing exclusion affects the avifauna at the community and species level across the dry and wet seasons. Focusing on an NGO-driven initiative that has implemented a large network of small-scale farmer-managed grazing exclusions in Burkina Faso, we show that species richness and occurrence probability of most bird species were higher in grazing exclusions compared to control sites. These positive effects were more pronounced during the dry season, suggesting an ecological refuge effect when resources are limited. Despite overall positive effects on birds, we found species- and guild-specific responses to grazing exclusion with species positively or negatively affected. While grazing exclusions typically had negative effects on open-habitat specialists, frugivores, insectivores, species associated with woodlands, and Afro-Palearctic migratory species were winners. Grazing exclusions, even at small scale, show a great potential to combat desertification, reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss thereby being in line with the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Yet, we emphasize the need for further studies including a socioeconomic perspective to ensure durable benefits for rural communities.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBiodiversityBirdsHerbivoryLivestockSeasonsAnimalsBurkina FasoConservation of Natural Resourcescattle farmingecological refugehabitat restorationland degradationpassive acoustic monitoringSahelseasonalitysustainable use of natural resources

Identifiers

PMID41358538
PMCPMC12683984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.