ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025
Dispersal can spread management benefits: Insights from a modeled Fijian coral reef network.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dispersal can spread management benefits: Insights from a modeled Fijian coral reef network.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The combined effects of coral and macroalgal propagule dispersal, local bistability dynamics and pressures that span the land-sea interface are not well understood, and consequently, are not well accounted for in coral reef management planning. In particular, fishing and sedimentation from nearby watersheds can tip reefs from coral-dominated stable states to macroalgal-dominated stable states. To address these knowledge gaps, we developed a mathematical model of the benthic cover dynamics of a 75-Reef network in Fiji to compare the effectiveness of three different management intervention types: extending the area of periodic fishery closures to encompass more reefs (modeled by increasing herbivore grazing rates; managing a sea-based pressure), improving water quality across Fiji (modeled by decreasing coral mortality rates; managing a land-based pressure) and the two interventions combined (managing land and sea-based pressures simultaneously). We ran the model with three grazing scenarios (low, medium, high) to account for uncertainty in actual herbivore grazing rates among reefs, as well as to represent regimes of macroalgal-dominated, bistable and coral-dominated dynamics in isolated reefs. Our results indicate that the presence of connectivity in the model stabilized the dynamics, with the final benthic cover and management effects exhibiting almost no sensitivity to initial conditions under the medium grazing scenario. The model predicts that the integrated land-sea management is the most effective management intervention for ensuring high coral cover (>30%). We also find that fishery closure management that improves the grazing rate in less than half of the reef network can lead to increases in coral cover across the entire reef network. This result suggests that, as long as a few reefs in the network have high grazing, reefs across the network may trend to high coral cover as long as environmental conditions do not change. Based on an expected value of perfect information analysis, we find that the effectiveness of the integrated land-sea management intervention is robust to the three grazing scenarios and suggests that this model can inform management decisions even with uncertainty. These findings advance our understanding of how a network of ecosystem patches with local bistability could behave and informs their management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.