Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358512›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Keystone communities can rescue aquatic metacommunities influenced by pesticide contamination.

Camila Batista Vieira, Gedimar Pereira Barbosa, Ana Carolina Dos Santos, Neliton Lara, Erick Mateus-Barros, Jorge Laço Portinho, Hugo Sarmento, Gilmar Perbiche-Neves, Cassiana C Montagner, Luis Schiesari and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Keystone communities can rescue aquatic metacommunities influenced by pesticide contamination.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Camila Batista VieiraDepartamento de Biodiversidade, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gedimar Pereira BarbosaDepartamento de Biodiversidade, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2181-2369
Ana Carolina Dos SantosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Neliton LaraDepartamento de Biodiversidade, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Erick Mateus-BarrosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jorge Laço PortinhoDepartamento de Biodiversidade, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hugo SarmentoDepartamento de Hidrobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-7992
Gilmar Perbiche-NevesDepartamento de Hidrobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cassiana C MontagnerInstituto de Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luis SchiesariEscola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-591X
Victor S SaitoDepartamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6112-7249
Tadeu SiqueiraDepartamento de Biodiversidade, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-2904

Funding

CAPES 001CAPES 88887.473604/2020-00Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 303906/2021-9Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 309496/2021-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 409215/2018-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 15/18790-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 19/06291-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 2021/10639-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 21/00619-7Rufford Foundation 26823-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticide contamination in freshwater habitats is a major global issue, affecting water quality, biodiversity, and ecosystem services. Uncontaminated habitats embedded in agricultural landscapes might act as keystone communities, with the ability to restore diversity and ecological processes in contaminated sites through dispersal. Despite their potential relevance, the role of keystone communities in mitigating agrochemical contamination remains untested. We asked if pristine habitats embedded in agricultural landscapes can act as keystone communities and drive the recovery of contaminated habitats. To answer this question, we conducted a mesocosm experiment to simulate zooplankton metacommunity dynamics under three treatments: uncontaminated, fully contaminated, and partially contaminated metacommunities. We examined communities over time following dispersal and pesticide contamination to analyze their trajectories, diversity, and recovery capacity. Analyses were conducted for all species, as well as for Cladocera and Copepoda separately, at both local (individual communities) and regional scales (three communities linked by dispersal-i.e., metacommunities). Taxon-specific population trajectories indicated that cladoceran densities increased across treatments irrespective of contamination, whereas copepods exhibited species-level declines or increases under local pesticide exposure. These taxon-specific population responses to contamination altered community trajectories, resulting in a greater loss of species in completely contaminated metacommunities. Metacommunities with uncontaminated habitats partially recovered from contamination and showed compositional and gamma diversity patterns comparable to uncontaminated metacommunities. Recovery patterns differed across Cladocera and Copepoda, with recovery being more evident at the regional scales. Keystone communities had a greater influence on the recovery of Cladocera community composition and on Copepoda gamma diversity. Our results supported the prediction that keystone communities play a fundamental role in local and regional dynamics of aquatic metacommunities inserted in landscapes with a heterogeneous structure of contamination. Positioning preserved habitats well connected to impacted sites could allow a quick colonization after pesticide contamination, recovering the system until the next crop management cycle. However, taxon-specific trajectories underscore the need to consider functional and dispersal traits when designing mitigation strategies. We thus suggest a metacommunity perspective for better predictions of risks associated with pesticide use in nature and ways of mitigating them.

Indexed as

CladoceraCopepodaEcosystemPesticidesWater Pollutants, ChemicalZooplanktonAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringPesticidesWater Pollutants, Chemicalagrochemicalsdispersalfipronilmesocosmsmetaecosystemszooplankton

Identifiers

PMID41358512
PMCPMC12683696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.