ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2025
Cognitive Impairments Impact Functional Mobility in Stroke Survivors.
Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The multi-target protective effects of quercetin in cerebrovascular diseases: a dietary strategy for endothelial repair and neuroprotection.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundFunctional mobility is essential for maintaining independence and relies on both motor and cognitive processes. Although the impact of motor impairments on functional mobility in stroke survivors has been extensively studied, the influence of post-stroke cognitive impairments has been largely overlooked. The aim of the current study is 2-fold. First, to determine the impact of post-stroke cognitive impairments on functional mobility across a broad spectrum of tasks. Second, to determine if cognitive impairment has a differential impact on various forms of mobility.MethodForty individuals with stroke (20 cognitively normal and 20 cognitively impaired) and 30 healthy older adults participated in the study. Participants performed cognitive, motor, and mobility assessments. Cognitive tests included global and domain-specific assessments on an extensive neuropsychological battery. Motor tests included the Modified Rankin Scale and strength assessments. Functional mobility included the assessment of balance, overground walking, and driving in a simulator.ResultsFindings indicated that stroke survivors with cognitive impairment demonstrated significant deteriorations in functional mobility across multiple domains, compared to both cognitively normal stroke survivors and healthy older adults. Cognitive impairment significantly interferes with functional mobility, with driving showing greatest deterioration compared to balance and walking performance. Notably, this impact is independent of the level of disability and motor strength.ConclusionCognitive impairments in stroke survivors are associated with significant mobility disturbances, with the most pronounced deficits in driving performance. This study highlights the importance of including and prioritizing cognitive evaluation and intervention for enhancing functional mobility and independence in stroke survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.