Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358484›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2025

Compression Hosiery to Avoid the Post-Thrombotic Syndrome: a synopsis of the CHAPS RCT.

Ankur Thapar, Rebecca Lawton, Imad Adamestam, John Norrie, Sarrah Peerbux, Alun H Davies, CHAPS Trial Investigators

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ankur ThaparDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4542-1100
Rebecca LawtonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3079-4230
Imad AdamestamUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9769-9975
John NorrieCentre for Public Health, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9823-9252
Sarrah PeerbuxDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5560-0749
Alun H DaviesDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5261-6913
CHAPS Trial Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately half of adults diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis will develop the post-thrombotic syndrome leading to chronic symptoms - including leg pain, oedema, venous ectasia and, in 5% of cases, venous ulceration. Risk factors include older age, obesity, a history of blood clots, cancer and heart failure. Despite adequate anticoagulation, post-thrombotic syndrome remains a chronic health condition with significant financial burden for patients and health services. The effectiveness of compression stockings in preventing post-thrombotic syndrome is unclear and whether the risks and costs associated with compression stockings are justified. Design: The Compression Hosiery to Avoid Post-Thrombotic Syndrome study was a multicentre, pragmatic, assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial of adults with a first proximal deep vein thrombosis. Setting: Secondary care National Health Service hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants: Patients ≥ 18 years, with imaging-confirmed, symptomatic presentation of first deep vein thrombosis in the lower limb (popliteal, femoral, iliac or combination), ≤ 3 weeks from diagnosis. Interventions: Participants were randomised 1 : 1 to standard care (anticoagulation as per local guidelines) or intervention (anticoagulation as per local guidelines and regular use of a graduated compression stocking). Primary outcome: The primary outcome was any incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome using the Villalta criteria over a median of 18-month follow-up (range 6-30 months). This was planned to be assessed on up to three occasions (6 and 12 months post randomisation and at study end), depending on when an individual was randomised. Secondary outcomes: Planned secondary outcomes: incidence of venous ulceration (measured by the validated Villalta criteria) employment status (change in the number of days working from baseline) change in disease-specific and generic quality of life - Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study (VEINES-QOL/Sym) and EuroQol-5 Dimensions scales from baseline over 6 months, 12 months and end of study visit adherence to stockings and anticoagulants (patient self-report) cost-effectiveness of stocking prescription - incremental cost-effectiveness ratio from the EuroQol-5 Dimensions questionnaire, with appropriate sensitivity analysis. Results: The trial closed early due to poor recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic; and, of the planned sample size of 864, 152 participants were randomised. Post-thrombotic syndrome occurred in 51% of the control arm and in 30% of the intervention arm at last follow-up. No serious adverse events relating to stockings were recorded. Stocking adherence was a mean of 6 days (standard deviation 2) per week. Conclusions: The sample size was not reached, which precluded any formal statistical analysis. Although a difference in the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome was demonstrated, the effect size could not be determined. There is interest in understanding optimal strategies for the prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome in these patients and a re-run of this trial should occur. Limitations: The main limitation was its early termination. As a result, it did not reach the required sample size to draw any adequately powered conclusions. The analyses are descriptive and therefore we cannot determine whether there were any differences between trial arms. Future work: Answering the question of whether graduated compression stockings help prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome is important to both patients and clinicians. Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 17/147/47.

Indexed as

Postthrombotic SyndromeStockings, CompressionVenous ThrombosisAdultAgedAnticoagulantsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalUnited KingdomAnticoagulantsADHERENCEDEEP VEIN THROMBOSISGRADUATED COMPRESSION STOCKINGSPOST-THROMBOTIC SYNDROMERANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Identifiers

PMID41358484
PMCPMC12703836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.