ArticleJMIR medical education2025
Pass/Fail Versus Tiered Grades and Academic Performance in Undergraduate Medical Education: Crossover Study.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The impact of Pass/Fail or Tiered grade assessment for exams in undergraduate medical education has caused much debate, but there is little data to inform decision-making. The increasing number of medical schools transitioned to a Pass/Fail assessment has raised concerns about medical students' academic performance. In 2018, during the undergraduate medical curriculum reform at the Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University changed some exams from Pass/Fail to Tiered grade and vice versa for other exams. These changes provide an opportunity to evaluate the different assessment forms. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate medical students' academic performance at the final licensing exam in relation to the exam grading principle. Methods: This single-center cohort study at Aalborg University Medical School, North Denmark Region, assesses the change from 2-digit Tiered grade to Pass/Fail evaluation and vice versa of undergraduate medical students' exams after the 4th and 5th year clinical training modules from Autumn 2015 through Spring 2023. The primary outcome was (1) the average grades at the final licensing exam and (2) the number of students failing exams during the previous two years. Results: Among the total of 7634 exams, 7164 4th and 5th year clinical training exams were included in the comparisons, of which 3047 (42.5%) were Pass/Fail exams and 4117 (57.5%) were Tiered grade exams. The frequency of students failing exams was 3.3% (n=101/3047) at Pass/Fail and 1.97% (81/4117) with Tiered grade exams (P<.001). This difference was leveled out when counting the near-failure tiered grade as Fail. Tiered grade exams did not differ between semesters (P=.99) nor show a time trend at the 4th year (P=.66). The final licensing exam grades were unaltered (P=.47). Conclusions: Contrary to our expectation, Pass/Fail exams exhibited a higher fail rate compared to Tiered grade exams without lowering the final academic performance. These results suggest that a shift from Tiered grades to Pass/Fail assessment redirects the focus from rewarding high performance to ensuring standards are maintained among underperforming students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.