ArticleJournal of medical virology2025
Viability of Self-Taken Vaginal Swab Samples for RNA-Based Biomarker Analysis in Cervical Disease.
Article in Journal of medical virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Viability of Self-Taken Vaginal Swab Samples for RNA-Based Biomarker Analysis in Cervical Disease.Journal of medical virology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High risk human papillomaviruses (hrHPVs) cause most cervical cancers. Cervical screening programmes aim to identify precancerous disease using detection of hrHPV nucleic acid using clinician-taken liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples, or increasingly, self-taken samples (STSs). However, STSs are incompatible with traditional cytology triage. Therefore, development of novel triage tests is essential. Quantification of cellular and viral mRNA biomarkers is one option, but little is known about mRNA quality in STSs. We extracted RNA from two sets of STSs (reflecting separate sampling devices) from the Scottish HPV Archive (SHA) and the Swedish Cervical Cytology Biobank (SCCB). We investigated whether the ACTB, GAPDH and p16 RNAs could be amplified by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). RNA was degraded in both sets of samples, but samples from the Scottish HPV Archive were generally suitable for RT-qPCR analysis, while samples from the SCCB were mostly unsuitable. Genomic DNA contamination was detected in 11.6% of samples. The quantity and quality of RNA derived from STSs was unaffected by storage of the original sample at -70°C for a period of 1 year. These data suggest that feasibility of utilising STSs for mRNA expression work is device-dependent and that optimisation of collection and storage systems is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.