Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358388›Full record

ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2025

[Determination of ethylene oxide and acetaldehyde in petrochemical exhaust based on thermal desorption- gas chromatography-mass spectrometry].

Ying-Jie Li

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ying-Jie LiKey Laboratory of Formation and Prevention of Urban Air Pollution Complex,Ministry of Ecology and Environment,Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences,Shanghai 200233,China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethylene oxide (EO) and acetaldehyde are key components of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions in the petrochemical industry. The ozone formation potential of acetaldehyde is several orders of magnitude higher than that of EO. Therefore, accurately identifying and measuring these compounds is essential for developing effective ozone control strategies. However, separating EO from acetaldehyde presents a considerable analytical challenge due to their isomeric nature and comparable volatilities. In this study, a novel analytical method based on thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS) technology was developed to simultaneously collect, separate, and quantify EO and acetaldehyde. Optimization was performed on the GC column temperature program, thermal desorption temperature, and thermal desorption flow rate to achieve effective separation. Compounds were separated on a TG-624 SiIMS GC column (60 m×0.25 mm×1.4 μm) with a carrier gas flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. To separate EO from acetaldehyde, the GC column temperature was specifically optimized to enhance their differences in desorption rates from the stationary phase. The temperature was initially held at 30 ℃ for 3 min, then ramped at 5 ℃/min to 120 ℃, held for 3 min. Both full scan and selected ion monitoring modes were employed for target detection. During thermal desorption, the thermal desorption temperature was set at 180 ℃, the cold trap temperature was set at -30 ℃ for capturing desorbed targets, and the secondary desorption flow rate was set at 16 mL/min with the corresponding split ratio of 12.3. The method's performance was evaluated under optimized experimental conditions. Within the range from 1 to 10 ng/tube, the method showed strong linearity with correlation coefficients above 0.99 for EO and acetaldehyde. Method detection limits were determined to be 0.16 ng/tube for EO and 0.21 ng/tube for acetaldehyde. Thermal desorption efficiencies for both targets exceeded 95% with samples spiked at 2 and 10 ng/tube. Recovery efficiencies spiked at 2, 5 and 10 ng/tube ranged from 80.3% to 106.8%, with relative standard deviations ranging from 4.5% to 9.2%. This method was applied to VOCs samples collected from aftertreatment exhaust streams of two petrochemical units, where different concentrations of EO and acetaldehyde were detected. This study thus established a reliable method for the simultaneous collection, identification and quantification of EO and acetaldehyde in petrochemical emission matrices. Furthermore, this method can also be used for monitoring these compounds in diverse emission sources and ambient air, thereby providing essential data to support the management and control of reactive VOCs.

Indexed as

acetaldehydeethylene oxidethermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS)volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Identifiers

PMID41358388
PMCPMC12684013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.