ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Integrating meteorological and breeding data to predict maize yields using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic enhancement of root, tuber and cereal crops via pangenomics, multi-omics integration and AI-driven prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate crop yield prediction is vital for ensuring global food security, particularly amid growing environmental challenges such as climate change. Although deep learning (DL) methods have shown potential in yield prediction, they often demand large datasets and considerable computational resources. Methods: To address these limitations, this study developed a machine learning (ML) model to predict maize hybrid yields by integrating meteorological data with breeder-level genetic information, specifically breeding values estimated using the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) method. Four commonly used ML algorithms-Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR)-were evaluated and optimized through hyperparameter tuning. Results: Among these models, the RF algorithm achieved the best performance, with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.64, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1010.59 kg/ha, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 743.89 kg/ha, a relative RMSE (RRMSE) of 10.32%, and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 8.3%. Discussion: These results demonstrate that the proposed RF-based model can provide accurate yield predictions for specific maize cultivars under diverse planting conditions. This predictive framework offers practical support for farmers in selecting well-adapted hybrids and serves as a cost-effective, efficient tool for breeders to identify high-yielding maize hybrids optimized for particular environments. Consequently, the model promotes smarter breeding strategies and more precise cultivation recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.