Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358343›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Integrating machine learning and the GGE biplot for identification of climate-suitable grasspea genotypes.

Surendra Barpete, Arpita Das, Mangla Parikh, Sonika Yumnam, Muhammad Aasim, Seyid Amjad Ali, Akanksha Singh, Ashutosh Kumar Yadav, Narayana Bhat Devate, Smita Kaul and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Surendra BarpeteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)-Food Legumes Research Platform, Sehore, India.
Arpita DasDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Mohanpur, West Bengal, India.
Mangla ParikhDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Sonika YumnamDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, Manipur, India.
Muhammad AasimDepartment of Precision Agriculture and Agricultural Robotics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Sivas University of Science and Technology, Sivas, Türkiye.
Seyid Amjad AliDepartment of Information Systems and Technologies, Bilkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Akanksha SinghInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), New Delhi, India.
Ashutosh Kumar YadavInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)-Food Legumes Research Platform, Sehore, India.
Narayana Bhat DevateInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)-Food Legumes Research Platform, Sehore, India.
Smita KaulInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), New Delhi, India.
Sudip BhattacharyaDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Mohanpur, West Bengal, India.
Soumyayan RoyDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Mohanpur, West Bengal, India.
Sanjeev GuptaDivision of Crop Sciences, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, India.
Shiv KumarInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)-Food Legumes Research Platform, Sehore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grasspea is a nutrient-rich food legume crop known for its resilience in the challenging agro-ecosystems. However, information is scanty regarding the recommendation of grasspea genotypes with respect to their suitability for both general and specific adaptations. The primary goal of the study was to delineate stable grasspea genotypes by nullifying the influence of intricate interactions among multiple traits with the environment. Additionally, the study aimed to identify suitable locations within diverse agro-climatic zones in India for future evaluation while also validating and predicting results using machine learning algorithms. From several hundred genotypes developed and tested in station trials at Amlaha, India, a panel of 64 diverse promising grasspea genotypes was identified, and their performance was subsequently assessed through multilocation testing at four diverse locations in India during 2021-2022 using the GGE biplot approach. Mean selection index of each genotype was enumerated considering multi-trait performance for better elucidation of genotype and environment ranking as well as selection of the mega-environment. The findings revealed that the environment was the primary contributor to variation across all studied traits, followed by genotype × environment interactions as the second most influential factor. Genotypes such as FLRP-B54-1-S2, Prateek, 31-GP-F3-S7, 31-GP-F3-S4, FLRP-B38-S5, 48-GP-F3-S3, and BANG-288-S2 were identified as good performers with promising multi-trait performance. Experimental results were validated using multiple performance metrics, with the Random Forest (RF) model of machine learning demonstrating superior predictive accuracy compared to the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model. Regression coefficient (

Indexed as

GE interactiongrasspeamachine learningselection indexstability

Identifiers

PMID41358343
PMCPMC12679278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.