Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358307›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Information Theory-Guided Detection of Biomarkers Using Programmable Aptamer Arrays.

Amit Eshed, Alexander A Green

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amit EshedDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7172-6579
Alexander A GreenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2058-1204

Funding

Rapid Low-Cost Paper-based Biodosimetry that reveals individual organ injuriesU01AI148319 · NIAID · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI LABAER, JOSHUA · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Model-guided design of RNA stabilizing elements for improved coronavirus diagnosticsR01EB031893 · NIBIB · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI GREEN, ALEXANDER ARTHUR, WANG, XIAO · 2021 to 2022
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI148319NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While numerous endogenous nucleic acid biomarkers have been reported that are predictive for diseases like cancer, there has been limited development of devices that are tailored towards point-of-care (PoC) diagnosis using those endogenous biomarkers. Diagnosing based on endogenous biomarkers is challenging as its diagnostic value is based on concentration deviations from a healthy baseline. Here we report the Concentration Detector Array (CDA), a nucleic acid device that uses channel activated thresholds to identify and bin target nucleic acids into concentration ranges. Using consensus voting and error correction methods, we demonstrate that CDAs have excellent binning classification with an AUC = 0.945-0.955. Motivated by the diagnostic gap in non-small cell lung cancer detection, we developed probability distribution functions (PDFs) of prognostic miRNAs. After creating a library of miRNA sensing CDAs and PDF models, we demonstrated information theory-based diagnostic strategies to identify and classify patient profiles in a minimal number of tests. Our divergence maximization strategy was found to strongly identify profiles in a single test and learn maximal information content 1-2 tests faster than other expectation maximization strategies and use significantly fewer tests static non-learning methods required.

Identifiers

PMID41358307
PMCPMC12676410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.