Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358229›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Understanding care-seeking of pregnant women from underserved groups: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.

Tisha Dasgupta, Hannah Rayment-Jones, Gillian Horgan, Yesmin Begum, Michelle Peter, Sergio A Silverio, Laura A Magee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tisha DasguptaDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hannah Rayment-JonesDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gillian HorganDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Yesmin BegumThe ENGAGE Study Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Advisory Group, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michelle PeterThe ENGAGE Study Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Advisory Group, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sergio A SilverioDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Laura A MageeDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Delayed or reduced antenatal care use by pregnant women may result in poorer outcomes. 'Candidacy' is a synthetic framework which outlines how people's eligibility for healthcare is jointly negotiated. This meta-ethnography aimed to identify - through the lens of candidacy - factors affecting experiences of care-seeking during pregnancy by women from underserved communities in high-income countries (HICs). Methods: Six electronic databases were systematically searched, extracting papers published from January 2018 to January 2023, updated to May 2025, and having relevant qualitative data from marginalized and underserved groups in HICs. Methodological quality of included papers was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program. Meta-ethnography was used for analytic synthesis and findings were mapped to the Candidacy Framework. Results: Studies ( Conclusion: Improvements in antenatal care utilization must focus on the joint (service-user and -provider) nature of responsibility for care-seeking, through co-production. We suggest two additional Candidacy Framework constructs: 'intercultural dissonance' and 'hostile bureaucracy', which reflect the multi-generational impact of migration on healthcare utilization and the intersection of healthcare utilization with a hostile and bureaucratic environment. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023389306, CRD42023389306.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePregnant PeoplePrenatal CareVulnerable PopulationsAnthropology, CulturalDeveloped CountriesFemaleHumansPregnancyhealth care-seekinghealth inequalityhigh-income countriesmarginalized groupsmaternity carewomen

Identifiers

PMID41358229
PMCPMC12677011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.