Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358215›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Protocol for a naturalistic study of residents living in an agriculturally-integrated ("agrihood") neighborhood.

Jay E Maddock, Emma C Lewis, Deyaun L Villarreal, Alexandra L MacMillan Uribe, Kathryn M Janda-Thomte, Gang Han, Charles R Hall, Rodney X Sturdivant, Megan S Patterson, Meredith L Graham and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06950775 (A Naturalistic Study of Residents of an Agriculturally Integrated Community), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06950775 recruitingnot on this map

A Naturalistic Study of Residents of an Agriculturally Integrated Community

TypeobservationalSponsorTexas A&M UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled600ConditionsHealthy Eating, Cardiometabolic HealthArmsResidence in Agrihood Neighborhood
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jay E MaddockDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, United States.
Emma C LewisInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife, Texas A&M University System, Dallas, TX, United States.
Deyaun L VillarrealInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife, Texas A&M University System, Dallas, TX, United States.
Alexandra L MacMillan UribeInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife, Texas A&M University System, Dallas, TX, United States.
Kathryn M Janda-ThomteDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.
Gang HanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, United States.
Charles R HallDepartment of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, United States.
Rodney X SturdivantDepartment of Statistical Science, College of Arts and Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.
Megan S PattersonDepartment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, United States.
Meredith L GrahamInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife, Texas A&M University System, Dallas, TX, United States.
Rebecca A Seguin-FowlerInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture (IHA), Texas A&M AgriLife, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, United States.
M Renée Umstattd MeyerDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Poor nutrition and inadequate physical activity are key contributors to rising chronic disease rates across the United States. It is well-documented that neighborhood built environments play an important role in shaping these modifiable health behaviors. Agriculturally-integrated neighborhoods ("agrihoods") offer a relatively new and promising approach to health-promoting residential design and development. Centered around a working farm, agrihoods are designed to connect residents with fresh foods and outdoor spaces that encourage physical activity. However, no rigorous or longitudinal evaluations of their impact on resident health have been conducted to date. We detail the protocol for a naturalistic study that aims to (1) assess short-term changes in dietary intake, physical activity, cardiometabolic health indicators, and social connectedness among agrihood and matched comparison residents; (2) document time use with and preferences for agrihood design features; and (3) examine agrihood economic benefits. Methods: This mixed-methods, quasi-experimental study will last approximately 6 months including assessment at three timepoints (baseline, 3 months, 6 months). Agrihood participants will be new adult residents in an agrihood residential development (Richmond, TX), while comparison participants will be adults currently residing in a nearby residential development (Katy, TX). All participants will complete three 30-min online surveys, including items to produce geospatial data; agrihood participants will complete two additional 30-min in-person health assessments and three timepoints of accelerometer wear on 7 consecutive days, with a subsample completing three 30-min online dietary recalls. Data will be collected by trained staff, and Difference-in-Differences (DiD) generalized linear mixed-effects models will examine longitudinal change and its interaction with participant groups. The economic analysis will account for break-even time, farmer compensation, maintenance costs, and public incentive programs. Discussion: This will be the first study to examine a longitudinal cohort of new agrihood residents compared to a master planned residential development to understand the use and health impacts of agrihood living. Our data-driven design, including biological data collection, device-captured physical activity, and validated self-report measures, can pave the way for future research, policy and philanthropic initiatives to adapt and scale models for developments that promote environmental and economic growth, and improve human health and wellbeing. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06950775, Identifier NCT06950775.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentHealth PromotionNeighborhood CharacteristicsAdultDietExerciseFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicResearch DesignUnited Statesagrihoodbuilt environmentcommunity healthdietmixed methodsnutritionphysical activityprotocol

Identifiers

PMID41358215
PMCPMC12675236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.