ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A community public health emergency resilience assessment framework based on contrastive learning and hyperbolic embedding.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating university emergency resilience with a focus on student safety and health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recent global health crises have exposed critical gaps in community preparedness for public health emergencies, revealing that existing assessment frameworks often rely on generic indicators that fail to capture specific vulnerabilities. Methods: We developed an evidence-based assessment framework through systematic analysis of 230 peer-reviewed studies using contrastive learning algorithms and hyperbolic embedding techniques. The framework was validated by 15 international experts across public health, urban planning, and disaster management disciplines. Results: The framework comprises 39 indicators systematically organized into four actionable dimensions: (i) medical and safety measures, (ii) spatial design and infrastructure, (iii) community services and support, and (iv) landscape and ecology. Significantly, 23 indicators (59%) represent novel additions to public health emergency preparedness literature, including telemedicine infrastructure, community health surveillance systems, flexible space utilization, and distributed medical resource networks. The framework achieved high expert validation (mean score: 4.35/5.00). Discussion: By bridging the gap between abstract resilience concepts and measurable community capacities, this tool enables public health practitioners, urban planners, and local authorities to systematically strengthen community preparedness against future health emergencies. The framework's emphasis on spatial design and community infrastructure-alongside traditional medical measures-represents a paradigm shift toward holistic, multi-dimensional emergency preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.