Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41358192›Full record

ArticleSSM - health systems2025

Fiscal federalism, inter-governmental transfers and public health- The case of Urban Local Bodies in India.

Samik Chowdhury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Samik ChowdhurySchool of Public Policy and Governance, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public policy in India has historically ignored the potential of urban local bodies (ULBs), a constitutionally mandated third tier of Government, in addressing urban health issues. Constituted against the backdrop of an overwhelming pandemic, the Fifteenth Finance Commission (FFC) of India went beyond its conventional domain of recommending revenue sharing principles across different levels of Government, to make certain novel financial recommendations around decentralized provision of health services. This paper critically analyses the context, nature and scope of FFC recommendations for health to ULBs. In the process, the paper engages with diverse, yet connected themes like evolution of urban health policy in India, constitutional status and current fiscal situation of ULBs, their role in health service delivery, nature and composition of FFC grants for health and their status of implementation. A re-categorisation of FFC grants guided by a comprehensive understanding of health, shows that the grants are well designed to address the persistent, escalating as well as emerging public health problems of a rapidly urbanizing nation. Moreover, composition of these grants displays a clear emphasis on delivery of public health and primary health care services by local bodies - the tier of Government which is closest to its constituency. However, data from the first three years of the FFC period demonstrates inconsistencies in allocation, release and actual spending of health grants, which is likely to impact the realisation of its stated objectives.

Indexed as

Fifteenth finance commissionFinance commissionFiscal federalismIndiaInter-governmental transfersPrimary health carePublic healthUrban healthUrban local bodies

Identifiers

PMID41358192
PMCPMC12679917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.