ArticleSSM - health systems2025
Using causal loop diagrams to explore the maternal and child health system response to payment for performance in Zambia, and it's generalisability across settings.
Article in SSM - health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the generalisability of pathways depicted by causal loop diagrams (CLDs) in payment for performance (P4P) schemes by adapting and validating the Tanzanian CLDs to the Zambian context. Specifically, it explores whether the health system pathways represented by CLDs, are consistent across different settings and how variations in programme design and local context influence these pathways. Using a five-stage approach, the study adapted the Tanzanian CLDs to reflect the Zambian P4P programme context, validating them through stakeholder interviews, workshops, and secondary qualitative data. The findings show that while the overarching pathways influencing P4P outcomes are similar, differences in programme design and contextual factors shape their intensity and impact. Notably, Zambia's higher facility autonomy and stronger trust in the health system contributed to greater health worker motivation and service delivery compared to Tanzania. Programme design features such as safeguards for non-incentivised services and adequate funding for facility investment with provider autonomy influenced performance outcomes. Additionally, contextual factors such as trust in the system mitigated programme delays, while decentralised procurement systems enhanced P4P effectiveness. These findings highlight the need for context-specific adaptation when implementing P4P programmes. The study advances the application of CLDs for cross-country health system analysis, highlighting both their potential and limitations in comparing health interventions across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.